However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 23:00 on December 13, 2016, performed drinking with the victim D (58 tax) who is a workplace club in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around December 23:0, 201, on the ground that the Defendant, while drinking drinking with the victim D (58 tax) who is a dangerous object on his/her customer, was able to drink drinking expenses.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted bodily injury on the victim who could not know the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and D/D photographs, and parts of D/D images;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Considering the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, that the defendant does not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim who is a workplace partner, and that there is no record of punishment other than a single type of fine);