"2015 Highest 2828"

1. On April 28, 2014, the Defendant against the Victim F is the victim F at the “H Authorized Brokerage Office” office located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building 103, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim F is the victim F with the “G Building 719,” and the victim F is the substantial holder of the right to file a lawsuit.

On May 14, 2010, one bank will cancel the right to collateral security of KRW 103,200,000, the maximum amount of the bonds created in the future on May 14, 2010.

In addition, additional loans or limited real rights will not be established.

As such, it was said to the effect that the Jeonsea Agreement was “D”.

However, on May 27, 2014, the Defendant cancelled the right to collateral security and at the same time, it was thought that the Defendant set up a maximum amount of KRW 149,500,000 in the name of the Saemaul Credit Cooperatives, 200.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained KRW 20,000,000 as the deposit deposit for the rent deposit for the G building 719 from the injured party, and obtained the total amount of KRW 100,000,000 as the intermediate payment around May 26, 2014, and KRW 100,000 as the remainder payment around May 30, 2014.

2. On May 7, 2014, the Defendant against the victim J is the victim J’s “H Authorized Brokerage Office” office as stated in paragraph (1) around May 7, 2014, and the victim J is the party having substantial duty to file a contract with K and purchase and sale of the G building 1407.

On October 1, 2013, I would like to cancel the right to collateral security of KRW 273,00,000 which was established in the future of the Sisan Credit Cooperative on October 11, 2013 on the date of payment of the balance under the lease contract.

In addition, additional loans or limited real rights will not be established.

As such, it was said to the effect that the Jeonsea Agreement was “D”.

However, at the same time on May 26, 2014, Defendant 2 was thought to set up a mortgage equivalent to the maximum amount of 276,900,000 won in the name of the Saemaul Undong 2, 2014, and there was no intention or ability to cancel the new mortgage even with the remainder received.

Defendant 2.