A. The plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, Q, Q, M, U, M, M, M, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, and AC.

A. The plaintiffs are the parties. 1) The plaintiffs are the AF organization hosting "AG" composed of dentists (hereinafter "the instant hosting bank").

A. Members are members. 2) The Defendant is a golf instructor, and has led to the joint purchase of encryptions in a AF hosting room made for the joint purchase of digital encryption (hereinafter “Cryptourcy”).

(b) AH existing coding is a company that has developed certification technology to further enhance anonymousity while maintaining its integrity.

The company provides new technology to the existing block chain and encryption rather than issuing its own encryption, and has a business model to receive the relevant encryption in return for providing it.

Accordingly, a separate ICO (in-depth Coin) did not proceed with raising early development funds from many unspecified investors and taking part in the price of encryption in order to create a new coding, and was invested from a major venture capital or an individual who has been widely known worldwide.

C. The Defendant stated that “AE may seek an AI” at the crypting crypting room, and Plaintiff AE, a member of the above crypting room, applied the Defendant to the instant crypting room. 2) The Defendant concluded an AI purchase contract with the Defendant directly face-to-face with the Plaintiffs in the instant crypting room, “AH company,” and “AH company,” and 10% in the event of the purchase failure, refund 10% in the event of the purchase failure, and pay 1,380 AI (including crypt 15% in case of the purchase failure).”

3) Each Plaintiff listed in the [Attachment 3] List “Payment Date” column in the same list as indicated on each date, respectively, the respective interest points indicated in the same list in the same list (Provided, That 42 additional points in May 25, 2018, 70 points in May 24, 2018, 70 points in the Plaintiff AE, and 3 points in May 25, 2018, and the Plaintiffs.