임금 등
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① “A” and “B” under Section 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance; ② “A” under Section 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “B” and “B,” “B,” and “B,” under Section 11 of the 6th judgment as “a cleaning seminars”; ② “a status order” under Section 11 of the 9th judgment as “a command order”; ② 11 of the 29th 19th 16th 7th 7 parts of the cleaning machinery (scrink 16) respectively; ② the parts of the 17th 6 through 16th 16th 16th 17th 16th 16th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 18th 8th 8th 12th 2nd 200, and the part of the 23th 6th 10th 2nd 20th 2nd 3th 3th 20.
2. Part 6 through 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance in the part after the completion of the contract of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "contract of this case") provides for various matters such as the duty to observe working hours, the duty to observe the place of work, etc. to employees belonging to the cleaning service company. The written order of this case set forth the method of cleaning according to each place within the defendant hospital, the order of cleaning work, the frequency of cleaning work, and the articles of cleaning work. According to the witness AT of the party at the trial, the defendant hospital pre-publically disclosed a document that contains specific contents to be performed by the cleaning service company, such as the written order of the business of this case in the public announcement for the selection of the cleaning service company, and then entered into a contract with the service company after the completion of the contract without prior consultation on the contents of the written order of the cleaning service.