The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

The Defendants are the substitute driver who works in the Gu and the Gu.

At around 01:44 on January 28, 2015, the Defendants jointly set up a defense against Defendant A, who used the said victim’s vehicle on behalf of the victim, frightened the victim’s body, frightened the victim’s body, frightened the head, frightened the victim’s body, and frighted the Defendant B’s frightened the fright, and assaulted the victim’s head by hand. Defendant A assaulted the victim’s head by frightening the victim’s body, and Defendant B frighted the victim’s body with knee knee, and frighted the victim’s body with frightened the victim’s body, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim by assaulting the victim’s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 2 (1) of the same Act concerning the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc. and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;