beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.01.09 2018가단260422

손해배상(국)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Presumed factual basis

A. On July 14, 2017, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Southern Southern Detention Center.

At the time, the plaintiff showed symptoms of 1-2 times a month to 3th degree disability.

B. The Plaintiff exceeded July 26, 2017. On July 27, 2017, the symptoms of legs mathy, the bridge bridge bridges, and the symptoms of the conversation through the bridge bridges, and on August 17, 2017, the Plaintiff showed the symptoms of bridge mathy.

C. On August 24, 2017, the Plaintiff turned back to the lower end, and on August 29, 2017, the conversation was a speech disorder, and the telegraph showed weak symptoms.

Accordingly, as a result of the diagnosis and treatment conducted by the NWG, there was an opinion that “as the head of the Gu becomes the fluence of the fluence, it is necessary to conduct a close examination by transferring it to the third hospital.”

On August 30, 2017, the Plaintiff was in awareness of August 30, 2017, but sent back to C Hospital Emergency Service because it is difficult to express opinions.

C Hospital showed the fall and confusion of food, uncertainty and communication difficulties, the weakness of telegraph, and the symptoms of waste.

E. On September 15, 2017, the Plaintiff was discharged from C Hospital, and the name of the State diagnosis was brain pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary resistant and the name of the non-checkal cerebral cerebral cerebral Bribery.

F. On August 28, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having a 4th degree of brain disease disorder.

At present, there is a decline in recognition of China-do and opinions on both sides.

There is also an obstacle to the lush movement of downcoming her hand, making it impossible to walk, and making it difficult to walk.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 5 through 9, 13, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence of this court's commission of physical appraisal and fact inquiry results, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff suffered continuous harassment, such as assault and assault, from other prisoners.

Nevertheless, public officials of the Southern Detention Center did not take any protective measure.

B. The Plaintiff, as a person with a disability of class 3 of cerebrovascular, continuously sent symptoms, such as bridge paralysis, food degradation, etc. due to an excessive accident, but the public official in the remaining detention center, etc. accommodates the Plaintiff in the medical ward.