도로교통법위반(음주운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Punishment of the crime
On October 11, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws in the Chuncheon District Court's original state support on October 11, 2007. On May 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 10 months and a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime in the same court.
On March 23, 2018, the Defendant driven a BS-type car at the 14km section from the front of the “raw Mart,” located in 51 in the Hei-si Hei-si Hei-si Hei-si in the influence of alcohol level of 0.060% in the influence of alcohol level of around 00:54 on March 23, 2018 to the front of the “US Haak-gun,” located in 51.
On April 28, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car on the 12km section from around 12km to around 0.124% in front of the dwelling place in the Geong-gun C while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.124% in blood, around 14:56, around April 28, 2018.
Summary of Evidence
"2018 Highest 366"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the circumstances of a driver who is to take driving, report the situation of the driver who is to take driving, and report the results of regulating drinking;
1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (netly 9), 2018, 493;
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Inquiries into the circumstantial records of drivers of drinking alcohol and the results of regulating drinking alcohol driving;
1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (in a net time 9), judgments, and the application of the written indictment-related statutes;
1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, and the choice of a penalty;
1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes appears to be against the defendant's wrongness. While the defendant did not cause a traffic accident during each of the crimes in this case, the defendant has a history of criminal punishment for three times by driving alcohol, and in particular, the defendant was under the influence of 0.209% alcohol while driving a motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of 0.209% alcohol during blood, and was sentenced to suspended sentence in 2012.