beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.12.01 2017가단5792

물품대금

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 70,104,50 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 28, 2017 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Fact that there is no dispute over the cause of claim. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff supplied a piece of goods to the defendant by October 21, 201, the plaintiff is obligated to pay the plaintiff the remainder of the goods price of KRW 87,104,50 at the time the transaction with the defendant was completed, and the remainder of the goods price of KRW 70,104,50 at the time of collection by April 13, 2015 was recognized. Thus, the plaintiff is obligated to pay the plaintiff the remainder of the goods price of KRW 70,104,50 and delay damages.

2. The defendant's defense is a defense that the defendant fully repaid the remainder of the goods, so the fact that the defendant's Chok account transferred KRW 76.8 million to the plaintiff from the defendant's Chok account was not disputed between the parties, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the defendant's repayment was made only with the above facts and the evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including the serial number if a serial number exists; hereinafter the same shall apply). Rather, according to the evidence No. 2, according to the facts stated in the evidence No. 2, it is recognized that the plaintiff started a single transaction between C using the trade name the same as the defendant and C using the trade name as the defendant and June 28, 2012, the fact that the defendant prepared a written confirmation

The defendant's defense is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the remaining goods priceing KRW 70,104,50 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from April 28, 2017 to the date of complete payment as requested by the plaintiff, which is the day following the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order in this case. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.