손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. Basic facts
A. On March 31, 1990, the Plaintiff obtained a private taxi transport business license from the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 31, 1990, and operated a private taxi transport business (vehicle number C: hereinafter “instant taxi”).
3. A fine for negligence on the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 3th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 1st day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 3th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 3rd day of the 20th day of the 20th day.
B. While operating the instant taxi, the Plaintiff was subject to the disposition as indicated below by the head of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City during the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013 by committing a violation of the Passenger Transport Service Act.
The penalty points of administrative disposition on August 2, 2012, the calculation method of the penalty points of an administrative disposition on the date of the disposition of the penalty No. 1 of the penalty points of the year x the average penalty points of a year x 20 x 400,000 won on September 3, 2012 x 400,000 won on February 6, 2013 x annual average penalty points of a violation x 10 won on February 6, 2013 x annual average penalty points of a fine for negligence x 80 x 80 x 74 x 200,00 won on February 18, 2013 by October 9, 2013.