2. In full view of the facts that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, even though the number of criminal records, such as the judgment penalty force, was committed, and the risk of committing the instant crime is high by stealing property through intrusion upon another’s residence, damage recovery, and not agreed with the victims, and other factors for sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing against the Defendant appears to be reasonable by fully taking into account all the circumstances, including the various factors for sentencing asserted by the Defendant, and no special circumstance exists to the extent that the lower court’

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.