2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On May 19, 1980, the Plaintiff went to the Gwangju-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju in order to move to the friendly Gu. At the entrance, at the time of the entrance, the Plaintiff was faced with the head, boom, arms, etc. from the Martial Law Forces called up for the suppression of the 5.18 Democratization Movement due to the total head plate and the difficulty stiff, etc.

B. On January 31, 1998, the Plaintiff filed an application for the payment of compensation to a person related to democratization movements and rejected two requests for reexamination again, and filed a request for reexamination again on January 31, 201, by the Chairperson of the Deliberation Committee on Compensation for Persons Related to the 5.18 Democratization Movement after dismissal. On March 29, 2012, the 5.18 Democratization Movement Review Committee presented an opinion that “it is necessary to determine disability ratings, etc. by considering the applicant’s application details, statement, etc., but it is credibility.” On March 29, 2012, the disability grade Review Committee deliberated on the Plaintiff’s disability grade as “other grade 1, 4, 14, 14, and 9, 14, 14, and 9, 2013.”

C. According to the determination of the subcommittee on determination of the above disability grade, the Compensation Deliberation Committee for Persons Related to the 5.18 Democratization Movement (hereinafter “the Committee”) decided on June 24, 2013 that the Plaintiff shall be paid KRW 12,00,000,000, including living allowances of KRW 10,000,000 as compensation, and consolation benefits of KRW 2,00,000 as compensation, on the premise that the Plaintiff falls under the disability grade of Grade 1 as a person related to the 5.18 Democratization Movement.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 6 (including each number in case where there is a provisional number), Eul's 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion is 16 years of age.