However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 14:10 on July 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around the stairs near the stairs near which the Defendant came to the “Cda” on the first floor of the building located under the building located under the YY-gu, the Defendant: (b) had the female employees of the “Cdada” told themselves that he should be subject to other customers; (c) had the said female employees and customers in a state of under the influence of alcohol, and had them look at the said “Cda” in a state of under the influence of alcohol; (d) had the said female employees and customers; and (e) had the phone gas (295 mp), one string, one string, one string, and one string, and attaching a stop to the Rab.

After that, at around 14:30 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to flick by using one rail (including approximately 200 l, punch), two cunch paper, and one raz. On the same day, around 14:50 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to flick by using one raz, one fl, one flick, one flick, and one flick in the same place near the above "Cda" at around 15:15 on the same day. At around 15:15, the Defendant attempted to flick by using two raz ( approximately 200 l), two flick for travel, and one flick for travel, and tried to flick the above "Cda" for four times in total.

As a result, the defendant prepared for the purpose of setting fire to a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;