beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.09 2017고단735

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

Punishment against the Defendants shall be prescribed by ten months of imprisonment.

However, the two-year period from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 5, 2017, Defendants of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) met with the victim E (35 years of age) who is another customer in the south-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul at around 01:40 on the ground that they met with the shoulder of the victim E (35 years of age) at the main corridor of "D" located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was able to take the face and body of the victim by drinking, walking the victim's face and body in several times, walkinging the victim's body that is beyond the floor due to the outbreak, Defendant B was able to take the victim's face and body several times, walking the victim's body that is beyond the floor, and the Defendant's parallel F was participating in it and was able to take the victim's face by drinking, etc., and opened the victim's face at approximately 28 days, such as 4 mix 4 mar, sing, and stal.

As a result, the Defendants, together with F, injured the victim.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties are separated by assistant H and policeman I belonging to the Y of the Donannam Police Station G police station in the Yanandong-gu, the dispatch of which was dispatched after receiving the report as described in paragraph 1 at the place described in paragraph 1 at around 02:05, Jan. 5, 2017, and confirmed the identity of the Defendants A.

Defendant B, at the time of resistance to the assistant H belonging to the G police box, was satisfed by I, fatd the face of I on one occasion, and Defendant B, on the ground that Defendant B, who was next, arrested Defendant A as a current offender with interference with the performance of official duties, committed assault by satching I’s fatch.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, and K;

1. On-site photographs, E upper photographs;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements made by police officers I)

1. Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Criminal Facts, Article 2 subparag. 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.