개인정보보호법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who violates the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act shall find out a certain person's location and contact information from among credit information companies, etc. or investigate his/her private life, other than commercial transaction relationships, including financial transactions;
On January 19, 201, at the office of “E” in the operation of the Defendant located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the F, who reported and found the advertisement “E” advertisement to find a person (i.e., a fire), and received compensation for damage caused by the wind in the G operation plant; and (b) did not receive compensation for damage; (c) received a request from G’s current residence from the F, to find out the whereabouts of a specific person by using the G vehicle number that was provided by F after being delivered one million won as a consideration for the request; and (d) made it a business to find out the whereabouts of the specific person by means of determining whether the whereabouts of the person are unfolded by using the G vehicle number that was provided by F.
From that time to December 13, 2012, the Defendant was engaged in business activities to find out the location and contact information of a specific person or to investigate private life, other than commercial transaction relationships, by not having a credit information company, etc. over 24 times in total, as shown in the attached crime sight table (1).
2. No person who violates the Act on the Protection and Use of Location Information shall collect, use, or provide location information of an individual or mobile object without the consent of the individual or the owner of the mobile object;
On November 4, 2011, the Defendant: (a) received a request from H to investigate and change the status of the wife’s unknown fact; (b) received KRW 2 million from H under the name of the request; and (c) attached the location tracking device on the Bridge, which was driven by H, to H’s JSM mar (SM3), and then sent the location to H via the Internet, and notified H of the location by means of mobile phone text, etc.
Accordingly, the Defendant is H.