However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the operator of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” located on the fourth floor of the building B.

No one shall distribute or provide game products, the contents of which are different from the classification obtained, for the purpose of use.

From June 13, 2019 to June 27, 2019, the Defendant provided “D” game products that had 60 game apparatuses and sought the above game site, regardless of the game time limit and the number of remaining notices, and provided “D” game products that change the method of running the game by a sprink method that launchs the sprink.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products different from the contents of the rating for distribution or use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Control photographs, control manuals, C Illegal dogs and altered CDs;

1. Existing evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 6 of this Article confiscated;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing appraisal results revolving (D-Seoul).

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the scope of recommendation [decision of type] according to the sentencing guidelines; (b) the use and provision, etc. of illegal game products [Class 1]; (c) the basic field of classification and provision [the scope of recommendation and recommendation]; (d) the crime of this case in which the defendant changed the method of running the game differently from the contents of registration classification, thereby promoting speculative spirit by providing a game in which the defendant changed the method of running the game differently from the contents of registration classification; and (e) the defendant needs to strictly punish the defendant in consideration of the fact that the size of the game of this case is not small.

(b).