근로기준법위반등
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant, as the representative of the corporation B, did not pay C's wages and retirement allowances working at the above workplace, and this is a crime falling under Articles 109 (1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 subparagraph 1 and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent pursuant to Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act and Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act. According to the written withdrawal of the written withdrawal of the written complaint filed in the records, C can be recognized to have withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on February 7, 2013 after the prosecution of this case. Accordingly, all of the indictments in this case are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph