However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim C(the age of 25) are workplace clubs that work for the same company as articles.

At around 02:00 on July 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent alcohol to the victim in front of the Dcafeteria of Tae-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) sent alcohol to outside and out of the body; (c) tried to give lessons to men in the name in the body of the victim; (d) tried to take away the body of the victim from the body of the victim; and (e) tried to take away the body of the victim from the body of the victim; and (e) then lost the body of the date the victim was returned, and (e) ordered the victim to take twice the victim’s neck, (e) 2, 3 times the left-hand buckbuck, and (e) let the victim do so on the floor; and (e) then, (e) let the victim do so with the body of the victim, and (e) let the victim do so, and (e) let the victim do so by the autopsy, and (e) let the victim do so for 7 and 2 days at the left-hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the agreement with the victim, and the fact that no previous agreement exists and the crime is recognized and reflected);