If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 27, 2012, the Defendant applied for a public summons to the effect that “The Defendant lost the checks at Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E on May 22, 2012, 2012, the Defendant sought a nullification judgment from the above court on the ground that, around 23:00 on May 22, 2012, the Defendant, the husband of the Defendant, issued two copies of cashier’s checks issued 1 million won/one million won/one million won/one million won/one million won/one cashier’s checks issued at the south branch of the National Bank to repay the Defendant’s obligations to the victim at the seat of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangdong-gu, Seoul.” However, the Defendant failed to receive the receipt that the Defendant paid the obligation from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A request for a public summons, certificate of receipt, or check;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 352 and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;