2. In light of the fact-finding conducted by the E-mental Health Doctors of this court, the fact-finding conducted by the defendant as a social work personnel after serving as a result of the fact-finding conducted by him, and the fact-finding conducted a mental and physical treatment from March 16, 2017 to July 24, 2017 is acknowledged, and the first record of the defendant's refusal to serve as a social work personnel is stated only that "the defendant was unable to attend the office late," and even when examining the medical records submitted by the above hospital, it does not seem that the defendant suffered from serious mental illness to the degree that he would be hindered in serving as a social work personnel. Thus, the fact-finding conducted by the above hospital cannot be deemed that there is a justifiable reason to reverse the defendant's repeated service. Accordingly, there is no change in special sentencing conditions compared with the court below's judgment, and the defendant's explanation of the reasons for sentencing and all of the conditions of sentencing in this case, including the fact that the defendant started to serve again after the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and the court below's reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.