화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that E, at the time of the testimony of the court below, stated that the time of the court below's testimony was old and the investigative agency's statement was in accordance with his memory at the time. The investigative agency stated to the effect that the defendant inhales the defendant together with the defendant, that two ex- Kao, five plastic paper with the defendant in the crime scene of this case was discovered, and that there are several times of war for the defendant. In light of the fact that the defendant had several times of war, it can be acknowledged the fact that the defendant inhales the ex-factory as recorded in the facts charged.
2. According to the records of this case, the court below, based on the legal statement of E and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor, proved that the facts charged of this case was beyond a reasonable doubt.
Since it is reasonable to determine that the prosecutor's argument is insufficient to view, the prosecutor's argument is without merit.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.