beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고단2559

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 3, 2016, the Defendant entered into an application for the financial product of the vehicle of the 1510 Oral Dold 253 (State) in Korea’s EFC office at the Daejeon PFC office on August 3, 2016, and was affiliated with the victim’s MFC Co., Ltd. (State), and was loaned KRW 20 million to the Korean EFC employees B by purchasing the vehicle of the 20 million straw straw C201 and repaid KRW 762,74 of each month.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant provided the above vehicle as security by borrowing KRW 20 million from DE on August 4, 2016, even if the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million from the victim company to purchase the vehicle.

On August 3, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim company, received KRW 20 million from the victim company the principal of the loan around August 3, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. According to the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the following circumstances for sentencing (the choice of imprisonment), and other records, including the defendant's age, occupation, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of the case, shall be comprehensively determined as ordered.

The favorable circumstances: The confession of the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and the amount of damage will be faithfully repaid.

The extenuating circumstances that are disadvantageous to the victim: The fact that the responsibility for the crime is not less severe in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case, the fact that the amount of fraud is not substantial, the fact that the victim did not agree with the victim, and that there has been a record of being punished several times for the same crime.