beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.18 2016나52582

물품대금

Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay 12,00,000 won to the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff and its corresponding amount.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The transportation cost paid by the defendant is borne by the defendant." The defendant is a commercial practice that the plaintiff and the defendant bear the transportation cost according to the private contract, and the plaintiff agree to the effect that the plaintiff shall pay the transportation cost by the private contract and the plaintiff shall settle the expenses later. However, although it is not sufficient to recognize the above argument only with the evidence No. 10-1, No. 10-2, and there is no other evidence, the above argument is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of "the transportation cost paid by the defendant is borne by the defendant."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and since the plaintiff's succeeding intervenor participated in the succession at the trial, it is decided to revise the judgment of the first instance court in accordance with this judgment, and it is so decided as per Disposition.