1. On June 2, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Victim D’s Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government intends to purchase a heavy car and to carry out the business of importing or exporting it, to invest a heavy car purchase fund or to borrow a borrowed loan, to pay a profit on the basis of the loan, and to pay all the principal and interest if the money happens.”

However, at that time, the Defendant had intended to use the money to be paid by the injured party for personal purposes, such as living expenses, repayment of other debts, etc., which are not the money to be paid by the injured party. The amount of debt exceeds KRW 130 million, and was bad credit, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if it was invested or borrowed from the injured party due to the lack of special property and income.

Nevertheless, as above, the defendant deceivings the victim and thereby deceiving him as above, KRW 2,50,00 on the same day, KRW 13,000,000 on the 3th of the same month, KRW 4,000,000 on the 19th of the same month, KRW 500,000 on the 22th of the same month, KRW 3,000,000 on the 25th of the same month, KRW 3,670,00 on the 27th of the same month, KRW 3,670,00 on the 27th of the same month, and the same year.

7.8. Minority 3,450,000 won, and the same year.

8. Around December 12, 200, a total of KRW 60,120,000,000, around around KRW 30,000.

2. On January 8, 2010, the Defendant requested the victim to borrow KRW 15,00,000,000, te, which is provided as security for her food vehicle, at a bank where the trade name in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Square unknown, around January 8, 2010, the Defendant: (a) borrowed 15,00,000,000, which is provided as security for her food vehicle; and (b) paid the interest of 5% per month

The author made a false statement to the effect that domestic and foreign joint and several sureties borrowed money to E.

However, in fact, E did not have intended to borrow money from the victim of the above food vehicle as security at that time, and the amount to be paid from the victim was intended for the defendant to use the money as a insufficient purchase fund while purchasing the food vehicle from E.

Nevertheless, it is not possible.