상해
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant: (a) around 03:20 on February 12, 2015, at the Ejuk point in the operation of the victim D (57 years of age, n) located on the first floor of the former C underground in Ansan-si; (b) went back after the victim’s hair is skeked on the part of the victim’s head, on the ground that the drinking value does not adversely affect the credit; (c) five times in the part of the victim’s right to the right to the right to the victim’s drinking; and (d) caused injury to the victim’s number of days by putting the victim’s right hand on the table.
2. The Defendant and the defense counsel alleged that the Defendant committed a crime that did not inflict any bodily injury by either breaking the victim’s right part to the right part due to drinking, or breaking the victim’s hand, etc., although the Defendant took a bath for the victim and putting the head debt up to the bottom.
First, we examine whether the defendant's act, such as the facts charged, inflicted an injury on the victim.
According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is recognized that the victim suffered serious injury due to the right hand, etc. at the same time and place as stated in the facts charged.
그런데, 피고인의 행위로 피해자가 위와 같은 상해를 입었다는 점에 대하여 들어맞는 ‘피고인이 주먹으로 목 주위를 5번 때리고 그 상태에서 손등이 모서리에 부딪혀 시커멓게 부었다’는 피해자 작성의 진술서의 기재와 ‘피해자가 피고인의 폭행으로 우측 손등이 탁자에 찧어 손등이 부어오는 등의 피해를 입었다고 했다’는 경찰 수사보고의 기재는 이와 다른 내용의 피해자의 법정진술 등에 비추어 믿기 어렵고, 검사가 제출한 다른 증거들만으로 피고인이 피해자의 오른쪽 손등을 잡고 테이블에 세게 내리치는 행동을 하였다
The defendant's act, such as the statement in other facts charged, is insufficient to deem that the victim suffered the above injury, and there is no other evidence to prove this otherwise.
Therefore, it is true.