However, the Defendants are above two years from the date on which each judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendants are friendly to the post-ray relationship in Pyeongtaek-dong.

1. On February 2, 2018, Defendant A, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seocheon-si E and Dong 205 on February 16, 2018, had the Defendant drinked and talked with the victim B, and had the Defendant listened with the victim B, Defendant A suffered an injury to the victim by treating the victim’s face one time with the Defendant’s hand, with the victim’s face taken one time with the Defendant’s finger, with the victim’s face taken one time with the Defendant’s face taken one time with the Defendant’s hair, which is a dangerous object at the same time, and getting the victim out of the victim’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. Defendant B inflicted an injury on the number of days of treatment, such as the victim’s head getting off once the victim’s head, walking back 2-3 times the victim’s chest, and getting out the victim’s head getting out of the victim’s head at the time, place, and the victim’s head at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, suspect B telegraph photographs, investigation reports (a copy of the medical records of the suspect A), copies of medical records, and investigation reports (a report accompanied by a detailed statement of medical expenses to be submitted by the suspect A);

1. The Defendants: Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act; and Article 258-2 of the same Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the community service order: The Defendants’ reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act are recognized as erroneous and reflected.

The Defendants, as in the house, obstructed the instant crime while driving together with each other.

All the Defendants have long committed the same kind of crime.