사기
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On July 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the support for the development of the Suwon method, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 30, 2018.
[Criminal facts] The defendant is the person who works as the representative of the removal company C.
On September 1, 2014, the Defendant presented the “standard subcontract agreement for the removal of the said construction site” to the victim E at the members D parking lot in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Seoul-si, the Defendant: “F, the beneficiary: the representative of G Co., Ltd., H, the managing director, I, and the construction site: Gyeonggi-do, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon-do: the contract period: from August 20, 2014 to October 31, 2014, as if the removal of the said construction site was normally concluded between the said companies (hereinafter “instant removal construction”). The Defendant was awarded a contract for the removal of the said site.
The purpose of this case was to “I will complete the removal work by October 31, 2014, and pay the principal of the investment as well as half of the construction profit by paying KRW 40,000 as the investment money in connection with the removal work of this case” was false to the effect that I would complete the removal work of this case by October 31, 2014.”
However, even if the Defendant received investment from the injured party, he did not think that it would be used for the Defendant’s personal overdue wage payment and living expenses, etc. At the time, two commercial buildings entered the site of the removal work of this case, claiming right of possession and demanding compensation. At the time, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to complete the removal work of this case until October 31, 2014, and to pay the profits to the injured party. At the time, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to undertake the construction work of this case, even if he did not accept the contract of the removal work of this case without compensation from the above I, but did not confirm whether the contract was normally concluded.
Nevertheless, the defendant, as above, makes a false statement to the victim and belongs thereto.