사문서위조등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Around April 8, 2013, the Defendant agreed to use the land of a clan inherited to C, including his own large shape C, as a clan property, which was created from the place of the instant charges. However, around May 1, 2013, C appears to have lost its intent to transfer the ownership of real estate by causing a change in the depth, and in order to file an application for a provisional disposition prohibiting the disposal of the real estate on the fourth parcel of land under C’s name, the Defendant arbitrarily prepared a written promise to sell and purchase the land under C, etc.
The prosecutor prosecuted this part of the facts charged as follows: “The intention to transfer the ownership of real estate is to be indicated without intention to transfer the ownership of real estate,” but the lower court acknowledged the facts charged by correcting the expression “interest deemed to have lost the intention to transfer the ownership of real estate.”
Around May 6, 2013, the Defendant forged each private document related to the Rules of the clan and the Resolution of the Resolution of the Chungcheongbuk-gun on May 6, 2013, in the Defendant’s house located in D, with the consent of all members of the clan, using computers and printing machines to delegate all of the duties to A with the consent of all members of the clan in order to promote the management, etc. of the property of the E clan, and the chairperson and the members of the clan sign and affix their seals to the Resolution to the Resolution, and to prove it, the Defendant arbitrarily prepared each of the above Rules of the E clans by holding an extraordinary clan on May 6, 2013 and each of the following documents: (a) holding a special meeting of the E clan on May 6, 2013; (b) 1,11 square meters, G 853 square meters, H 506 square meters, I 513 square meters, and the name and seal of each of the executives of the clan; and (c) preparing each of the above Resolution, stating C1 and each of the seals.
Accordingly, the defendant does not have authority for the purpose of exercising.