However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the executive director of Company E that supplies automobile parts to D military production plants, and F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, M,O, P, Q, Q, Q, T, U,V, W, and X are the employees of the above company, and the victimY is the “Z” operator around November 24, 2010, who produced automobile parts by leasing automobile parts from AA(AAAAA acquired by E on November 24, 2015) and supplied them to AA.

The Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant did not settle the debt relationship with the victim AA prior to the acceptance, was the wind that the injured party discontinued the delivery of automobile parts and refused to return the gold sentence. While the Defendant was placed in the situation that E would not normally supply the automobile parts to D military factory, the Defendant was able to enter the factory of the victimized party with his employees without the decision-making or instruction procedures in the company, and had the same parts and gold punishment.

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant instructed 0, G, H, I, K, L, M, P, Q, R, U,V, W, and X to “ZE 2” at the office of E-factory located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City of North Korea, approximately 17:00,00,000 won, to open a gate which was corrected at the 5th trucking 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,00,00