예금
1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff E, KRW 272,727,272, and Plaintiff A, B, C, and D, respectively; and (b) against each said money, KRW 181,818,180 and each of the said money. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26759, Nov. 1,
1. Basic facts
A. The Deceased’s opening of the transferable deposit account and health aggravation 1) Net G (hereinafter “the deceased”).
on April 9, 2013, the Defendant Bank I branch in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Bank”).
) From the annual interest rate of 2.81% and the maturity date of July 10, 2013, two (Account Number: J and K) were opened, and deposited KRW 1,00,000,000 in each of the said two accounts (= KRW 500,000,000,000) in each of the said two accounts (hereinafter “transferable deposit”).
(2) 2) On June 7, 2013, the Deceased was in the state of water surface, having been hospitalized at the New Village Synas Hospital from around June 7, 2013, and had been hospitalized rapidly, and had been in the state of water surface after having attached an artificial absorption in the middle patient room from around June 11, 2013 to June 18, 2013.
3) Meanwhile, the Deceased from around 1990 to the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”).
The relationship with the deceased has been maintained. On June 13, 2013 and June 14, 2013, on the part of the deceased, the doctor instructed the intervenor to the possibility of the death and side effects of the deceased. (B) The intervenor had the intent to withdraw the transfer of the instant deposit before the deceased died or to receive the loan as a security before the deceased died, and on June 14, 2013, the intervenor filed an application for the loan with the Defendant bank as security of the transfer of the instant deposit at around 16:00, and submitted a loan transaction agreement (No. 6; hereinafter “the loan transaction agreement of this case”) in which the letters of the deceased were provided with the name of the deceased in his column and the offerer’s column.
2. The head of the Defendant Bank site L requested an intervenor to have a telephone conversation with the Deceased in order to verify the deceased’s loan and intent to offer collateral, and the intervenor said that “I would make a daily report and later have a telephone conversation.” However, the deceased was in the status of the said hospital’s house, because it was in the said hospital’s condition of the said hospital’s house, and thus, this is the case.