beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.04.18 2013고단91

간통

Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant: (a) was a spouse who has completed the marriage report with C on December 7, 2002; (b) was sent to B and once at a her mother line with B around May 2009; (c) was sent to B and once more; (d) around December 2009, the Defendant was sent to B and once from the FM vehicle that was parked in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul E-mail game parking lot; (c) around March 2010, the Defendant was sent to B and one time from the her mother line with B and the 20-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Do 100-dong 608, Jun. 1, 2010; and (d) the Defendant’s parking lot was parked at the 20-Gu Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City 2010-Ga.

Accordingly, the defendant had sexual intercourse with B over 11 times.

B. Defendant B, while knowing that he is a spouse of A, was sexual intercourses with A over 11 times at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1).

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a criminal complaint filed by the spouse pursuant to Article 241(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, C, the complainant, withdraws all of the complaints against the Defendants after the institution of the instant prosecution.