토지인도
1. The Defendants are “inboard” that connects the Plaintiffs with each point of Annex 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1.
1. In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including branch numbers), appraiser E’s survey and appraisal results, and the overall purport of the arguments, the plaintiffs are the owners of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2. The defendants are the owners of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1. The defendants are the owners of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2 list Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 in sequence connected with each point listed in the separate sheet Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, and 6 of the same map Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 10, and each of the above parts is the owners of toilets listed in the separate sheet Nos. 2 list No. 2, and each of the above parts is the owners of each of the two toilets No. 21, 213.
2. The Defendants purchased each of the instant buildings from the Nonparty and used them until now. They obtained permission for land use from the owners of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2.
It is argued that the owner has used the car while paying it.
However, even if there is no evidence to prove this fact, it cannot be recognized that the Defendants have a legitimate title to possess the real estate listed in the attached Table 2 list.
3. Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to remove each of the instant buildings, etc. to the Plaintiffs and deliver each of the lands listed in the separate sheet 2.
All of the plaintiffs' claims of this case are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.