A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in Articles 1 and 2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following “a dismissal or addition”. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The following is added to the 3rd page “paid.....”

E. The Defendant paid KRW 29,740 to F, who is the driver of the Plaintiff vehicle, KRW 23,176,00 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff vehicle, KRW 19,969,00 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff vehicle.

In addition, the Defendant paid KRW 7,836,250 (i.e., KRW 1,650,760, KRW 1,854,110, KRW 2,389,90, KRW 1,941,390) as damages for the instant accident against the driver and passengers of the 1,650 vehicle, and KRW 2,350,850 (= KRW 495,220, KRW 556,230, KRW 582,410).

The details paid by the Plaintiff and the Defendant due to the instant accident are as follows:

[Attachment 1] 5,139,570 won 29,740 won 5,740 won 27,169,310 won 23,176,000 won 50,969,000 won 19,969,000 won 19,969,000 won 42 damaged vehicles 4,989,400 won 4,650 won 1,650,650 won 50 won 1,650,760 won 1,650 won 1,650 won 1,650 won 1,650 won , 850 won 1,650 won , 1,650 won 1,650 won , 1,854,100 won 1,854, 1089, 2939, 309, 2939, 3094 won 500 won .

2. The plaintiff's judgment on the legitimacy of the counterclaim claim is based on the plaintiff's interest at the court of appeal.