도로교통법위반(음주운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On March 22, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch on March 22, 2016, and a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime in the same court on September 26, 2016.
On December 5, 2017, the Defendant driven CM5 car at approximately 50 meters from the 50-meter section to the front road of the Ganyang apartment house, in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.160%. From the road near the Ganyang-dong, the Defendant driven CM5 car at approximately 50 meters from the 50-meter section to the front road of the Ganyang-dong apartment.
As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, and driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again in violation of this provision.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;
1. Previous conviction in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, and a copy of each summary order;
1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. In full view of the records of this case and the various sentencing conditions indicated in the theory of changes, such as the defendant's criminal records for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the degree of the defendant's blood alcohol concentration during the driving of this case, the defendant's family relationship, and the defendant's mistake at the time of the driving of this case, etc., the sentence like
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.