위증등
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who operates an advertising company called "E" in Gyeongnam D, and the defendant C is a person who is engaged in the removal business and the disposal business in Gyeongnam F.
G in 2015, G was carried out by the head of Si/Gun, and I was a public official of Grade VI belonging to the H Gun and J is a person who operated L at K.
around October 15, 2014, G issued a e-mail card connected to the N bank account in the name of J and held the said card by G. However, G sent cash of KRW 30 million to P through O and P in the name of a public official in charge of promotion to G. On March 6, 2015, J deposited the said money into the account in the name of the said M. On March 9, 2015, G transferred KRW 3 million out of the said e-mail card to the account in the name of A on March 9, 2015, and withdrawn KRW 26.5 million in cash until March 17, 2015.
G on May 30, 2016, G was charged with the charge that it received KRW 30 million as a bribe from the Jinwon District Court Branch on the charge that it received KRW 30 million as a bribe. In the above case, G was not guilty of using the above physical card, and it was used by J, and denied the crime of bribery.
1. The facts of Defendant A’s perjury, as indicated in the statement, merely remitted KRW 30 million, out of KRW 30 million deposited in the above account in M’s name by J, to the account under the name of G by using the above physical card, and there was no record that J transferred the above KRW 3 million to the said account by using the above physical card after being supplied with the pents, etc. by the Defendant.
A. Nevertheless, despite the crime committed on December 15, 2016, the Defendant appears in the court of Jinwon District Court 201 on December 15, 2016 as a witness for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) against Gohap 51 G, etc. at the said court’s jurisdiction (Seoul District Court 2016 Jinju Branch), and made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant was given three million won a price in return for the production of a pen and a series on L in J in business and received through N account in the name of the wife M in the JJ on March 9, 2015.”