2. In full view of the various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age and happiness environment, the background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable even if the Defendant considered that he was a disabled person with physical inconvenience, considering the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times, including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a prison term, due to the crime of the same type of crime of the instant case, and that there was no agreement between the victims and the victims, or that there was no change in circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.