However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a driver of the vehicle B(one scar) in the accusation process (one scar).

Around 08:00 on August 10, 2017, the Defendant, along with the victim C (52 k) and through through through through, conducted the work of moving to the roof of the above church (not less than 10 meters in height) of string 25 strings (not less than 7m in width, about 70cm in length, about 19.9km in weight per head, about 497km in total) by using the vehicle with a string knick, without obtaining the type approval for the complaint work (one string sk).

In such cases, the Defendant shall not engage in any cateral work, such as moving of goods by using “afterk,” without obtaining the type approval as above, and even if the work is performed, he/she shall be obliged to take care of the work to prevent the occurrence of an accident in advance by taking out work after well-booming the roof and work conditions of the church, which is the construction site, the weight and manner of the goods, the move of boom b

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and used the above mar slate to move the above mar slate to the church roof without obtaining the above type approval, and mar the above mar slate to the rooftop of the above church with the victim of the mar asbestos slate, and after the victim instructed the defendant to prohibit the maring (rop) which is a combination of the above mar slate, in order to deduct the "saring (rop)" which is a combination of the above mar slate, the victim instructed the defendant to stop the maring, without taking any specific safety measures, while taking the above mar slate from the occupational negligence by cutting the mar slate to the above mar, return to the roof rail.

The damaged person who was in the bed area was shocked to fall up with the floor below the roof.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., the pulmonary paralysis caused by damage to the breath from the seat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made to F or G by the police;

1. Each internal investigation report (the attachment of photographs taken by a police officer stationed at the fall site);