2. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

A. The plaintiff et al. is members of the Boh-si C Senior Citizens Association (hereinafter "the Elderly Association of this case"). The plaintiff is the chairperson of the above Senior Citizens Association before the above Senior Citizens Association, and the defendant is the general director of the above Senior Citizens Association before the above

B. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant: “The Defendant, from the end of April 2013 to the beginning of May 2013, he was in charge of the general affairs of the instant senior citizens’ association, was sentenced to a fine of KRW 400,000,00 for the Defendant’s property of the victim, who had been placed in the front of the instant senior citizens’ association due to the inside repair of the senior citizens’ association; the Defendant, the victim, who was in charge of the general affairs of the instant senior citizens’ association, was sentenced to the lower court’s judgment on the following grounds: 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 4th, 4th, 1st, 1st, amper, 1st, ample, and 1st, which had been in custody of six goods, and then embezzled the victim’s property at his discretion among the storage of the said goods, and the Defendant’s judgment was reversed by the court of Daejeon 2014.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the ground for the plaintiff's claim

A. The Defendant asserted the Plaintiff from the end of April 2013 to the same year.

5. At will during the first competition, the plaintiff managed and stored 6,300,000 won in total as a result of the inside repair of the elderly hall used by the elderly hall, and the total market value of 6,30,000,000 won in total among the market value of the elderly hall owned by the plaintiff et al. (hereinafter “the goods of this case”).