2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and commits the crime of this case, which reflects his mistake, the defendant satisfied the total amount of money obtained by deceiving the victims and agreed smoothly with the victims, but the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed four times from June 26, 2014 to July 1, 2014 without the defendant's intent or ability to pay the price, and repeats the crime of this case in a short period as a total of KRW 1.190,00 won from entertainment tavern and did not pay the price thereof, and it is not good that the crime of this case is committed differently from the general intangible form due to economic difficulties, such as drinking the high amount of money, etc., and the defendant has been punished several times due to fraud due to the random type. In particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case by being sentenced to imprisonment of one year by this court on August 28, 2013, and the defendant's age of punishment can not be seen as being unfair even after the execution of this case's punishment of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.