손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The fact of recognition is the operator of the Seoul Red Cross Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Red Cross Hospital”) located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and the Plaintiff is a patient who received treatment at the Defendant Hospital.
On April 7, 2012, the Plaintiff was a driver of another motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle in the vicinity of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and was injured by the driver of another motor vehicle. The Plaintiff was injured by the driver of the motor vehicle.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” On April 9, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the left-hand body of abandonment and the head of the pelpel, and was discharged from the hospital by April 23, 2012 after being hospitalized on the same day (hereinafter “the first operation”).
On May 8, 2012, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital after the first surgery, and was diagnosed as a fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral (hereinafter “second surgery”) and was discharged from the hospital by May 25, 2012.
The plaintiff was unable to move on the left-hand left-hand side even after the second surgery, and "third surgery" was conducted on August 9, 2012 by visiting the defendant hospital at the defendant hospital on August 8, 2012.
A) A and was discharged by the time of hospitalization until August 24, 2012. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply)
(2) Each entry of the evidence referred to in sub-paragraph (1) to (3) and the purport of the whole pleading
2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff was unable to receive a proper diagnosis and treatment due to the medical malpractice (the specific content of the Plaintiff’s assertion stated in each of the following 3.3) of the Defendant hospital’s medical professionals, and that the Plaintiff suffered an obstacle, such as restriction on sports on the left-hand side.
The defendant is the employer of the medical staff of the defendant hospital, and is liable for damages equivalent to 12,295,800 won (i.e., 2,295,800 won for future medical expenses) incurred by the plaintiff due to the above medical staff's tort.
3. The defendant hospital;