2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a net manner and committed the instant crime in depth.

In addition, the defendant tried to return home life for about seven years after being released from prison, through the job program of the Legal Welfare Agency, but failed to adapt to this program, it seems that the defendant committed the crime of this case while he was living for day care.

Furthermore, some victims, including J, who are victims of the theft of this case, expressed their intent not to punish the defendant, and the vehicle driven by the defendant at the time of committing the traffic accident of this case was covered by the siren car deduction.

Such various circumstances are the circumstances that should be considered favorable to the defendant in the course of determining the punishment for the instant crime.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the Defendant, even though three months have not passed since the Defendant completed criminal punishment of imprisonment with prison labor due to the crime of robbery, injury, etc., and thus, the two-way share, etc. at the main point, stolen the goods of the workplace rent, and uses a credit card stolen from the place of entertainment bars, etc. several times, and further, driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol at a high level of 0.144% with a blood alcohol concentration, causing a traffic accident and causing injury to three victims, and the punishment of the unlawful act is not somewhat weak.

In addition, the defendant did not take active measures to recover damage of the victims of the instant traffic accident except for the payment of prescribed medical expenses, etc. to the victims of the instant traffic accident through a siren vehicle deduction.

In addition, the defendant has a past record of criminal punishment (including nine times of imprisonment) up to 11 times, and the defendant is still subject to criminal punishment, and there is no time to commit another crime.