Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is the purport of the claim and the appeal.

A. On June 9, 2017, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was determined and paid to the Defendant on February 28, 2018 as the due date for payment. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the above loan amounting to KRW 10 million and the delayed damages.

B. Determination 1) In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, as well as the fact that the Plaintiff, on June 9, 2017, remitted the amount of KRW 10 million to the account under the name of the Defendant C (the Defendant’s husband at the time) to the Defendant on June 9, 2017 (hereinafter “instant payment”).

2) 그러나 갑 제 2, 7, 10, 13, 16호 증, 을 제 1~9 호 증의 각 기재( 가지번호를 포함한다 )에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 원고는 피고에게 2016. 6. 10.부터 2017. 10. 10.까지 7회에 걸쳐 합계 3,870만 원( 이 사건 지급금 포함) 을 송금하였고, 2018. 4. 27.까지 피고로부터 이자 명목으로 합계 465만 원, 원금 명목으로 합계 3,300만 원을 지급 받았던 점, ② 원고가 2017. 8. 28. 피고에게 ‘ 돈 더 놔줄 수 있음 그냥 놔주라 여기 투자할려고 한 거 쫌 위험한 거 같어’ 라는 문자 메시지를 보내자, 피고는 원고에게 ‘ 알았어

Annoyeder who entered the Republic of Korea;

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) one month’s maximum amount of KRW 300,000 per month after being aware of the internal organ; (b) the Plaintiff sent the instant payment to the Defendant on October 10, 2017; and (c) the Defendant received all interest and principal for the remainder of remittance excluding the instant payment; and (d) the Defendant asserts, upon the Plaintiff’s request, that the Plaintiff lent the Plaintiff’s money to a third party and made it possible to receive interest, the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff is insufficient to recognize that the instant payment was a loan; and (c) there is any evidence otherwise recognized.