사해행위취소
1. Each appeal by the Defendants is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for
In Part 2, the term “the conclusion of the contract” in Part 14 through Part 15 is to read as “the conclusion of each credit guarantee agreement between our banks, foreign exchange banks, and national banks, with the content that the Plaintiff will act on behalf of the Plaintiff in the event of delay in the repayment of loans and obligations on behalf of our banks, foreign exchange banks, and national banks.”
In the third chapter, the registration of preservative measures on the real estate of this case was cancelled on April 1, 2013."
Part 4, "Defendant Company" in Part 20 and 22 shall be deleted.
2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the appeal by the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.