From September 2009, the Defendant operated C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “C”) from around 11, 2013, with the vice president in charge of C’s export affairs.

C around March 2013, around the end of 2013, sold in KRW 520 million the powder 4750 tons to the victim E Co., Ltd., and the victim exported the powder franchis to China on April 2013, but the victim was taking measures to return the scrap franchis in bad quality.

Accordingly, the Defendant agreed to supply 6,40 tons of other powder to the victim on October 28, 2013 as a substitute for the powder to be returned by the return measure on July 3, 2013, and supplied 3,000 tons of the powder to the victim on or around October 28, 2013, and upon occurrence of quality problems in the volume, the Defendant demanded the victim to pay 3,400 tons of the remaining volume to the Defendant during November 2013, 2013, and the Defendant agreed to pay 4,750 tons of the powder to the victim on January 3, 2014, immediately before the return of 4,750 tons, the Defendant and F to pay 3,000 tons of the powder to the victim by 38,000 tons, and the remaining 4,000 billion won of the scrap to be returned to the victim (the remaining 2,140,000 tons of the steel to 3,200 tons).

(The first agreement dated January 3, 2014). Since F urged the Defendant to pay the amount of KRW 100 million on January 14, 2014, which was the due date of KRW 100 million, the Defendant and D to make a new agreement with F on January 21, 2014, the Defendant and D to immediately pay the amount of KRW 50 million to the victim and the remainder amount of KRW 320 million (the amount of KRW 330 million shall be reduced to KRW 10 million from KRW 330 million) shall be paid by March 10, 2014 (the amount of KRW 50 million until February 20, 2014, KRW 300,000,000,000 and KRW 700,000,000 until March 10, 2014, KRW 300,000,000).