beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.01.31 2017고단1330

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has organized and operated a number system from around 2007, and it is the 15th day of each month, 26,800,000 won per month, 560,000 won per month, and 36 shares of 15th day of each month.

From the beginning, the Defendant: (a) purchased money from the Defendant as a fraternity and organized a fraternity to use it to repay the debt; (b) lent money to the Plaintiff; (c) used it as an officetel or screen golf practice hall investment; (d) the Defendant’s loan repayment; (e) credit card payment; (d) payment of credit card payments; and (e) payment of insurance premium; and (e) operated the fraternity in a way that prevents it from returning it to the fraternity, and (e) operated the fraternity normally.

1. On April 26, 2010, the Defendant of the 26th mutual savings bank fraud would pay KRW 26,800,000 to the victim C for the payment of KRW 36,00 on April 26, 201 if he/she joined a fraternity and paid KRW 560,000 each month in 36 installments.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, even if the defendant received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the payment agreed upon to the injured party, as well as to prevent the return of personal debt, real estate investment, appropriation of the fraternity, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, was delivered KRW 20,160,000 each 36 times from April 26, 2010 to March 26, 2013 by deceiving the victim, and then, from the victim to the victim, the Defendant was delivered KRW 560,00 per month.

2. On November 15, 2010, the 15-day gold fraud Defendant paid KRW 13,400,000 on October 15, 2013, when 36 each month was paid to the victim C by joining a fraternity, joining a fraternity and paying KRW 280,000 to the victim C.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, even if the defendant receives an advance payment from the injured party, he shall pay the individual debt.