beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고정1778

수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a corporation established with the trade name of "B" in Gyeonggicheon-gun Group C for the purpose of installing waste water-generating facilities and processing business for fiber salt, and Defendant B is a corporation established with the purpose of manufacturing and processing textile salt and processing business.

Any person who intends to install wastewater discharge facilities shall obtain permission from or report to the competent authorities.

1. The Defendant did not report to the competent authority, and installed and operated a 18 chroding machine, which is a wastewater discharge facility, in the foregoing factory B from November 18, 2016 to March 16, 2017.

2. In relation to the Defendant’s business, Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant, set up and operated a 18 chromosome flag with the competent authority without reporting as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written accusation, a written statement, a field photograph, a business registration certificate, a pending report on the charges for operating wastewater terminal treatment facilities, a certificate of all registered matters, and each investigation report (related to attachment of an additional statement, and the temporary composition of crimes);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 76 Subparag. 2 and Article 33(1) of the Water Quality and Water Quality Conservation Act; selection of fines

(b) Defendant B: Articles 81, 76 subparag. 2, and 33 subparag. 1 of the Water Quality and Water Quality Conservation Act

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) examining the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) recognizing all the criminal facts of the instant case, the Defendants are against their mistake; (c) without reporting within the area where Defendant B’s business site is located; and (d) there are many companies installing and operating wastewater discharge facilities; and (e) the Defendants did not pay the wastewater treatment charge.