However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 22, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch on June 22, 2015, and on December 5, 2016, the Defendant had the record of violating Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions by receiving a summary order of a fine of five million won for the same crime from the same court.

On October 29, 2018, at around 01:02, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car from approximately 2km to the front road of the sports park 2158, in a state of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.19%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, reply reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of identical records of a suspect A);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Taking into account all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and the criminal records of the defendant and the blood alcohol concentration;