However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 05:20 on March 9, 2013, at around 107, the Dju points located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, and (b) around 40 years of age, the victim E, the main owner of the said main store, and the Sitting, were accompanied by the method of cutting off one of the table tables equivalent to KRW 430,00,000 at the market price owned by the victim, which was located there.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. On March 9, 2013, at around 06:30 on March 9, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document, and was arrested as a flagrant offender, such as the crime of causing property damage, at the G police box located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, entered the confirmation column of the written confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender into H as the Defendant was H.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender under H, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in the above paragraph 2, exercised a documentary confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender, as if the document was a document duly formed, to the chief of the police box affiliated with the above G police box, who was aware of the forgery.

4. On March 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 07:52, at the criminal office and office of the Gangnam Police Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-dong 998, the Defendant was examined by the police officer affiliated with the said police station; and (b) entered the interrogation protocol prepared by the saidJ in the statement column.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the signature of the above H, a private signature, for the purpose of exercising the right.

5. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph 4, exercised the suspect interrogation protocol with the signature forged as if the signature was duly signed by the above J, without knowledge of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E, K, and L;

1. Ratification;

1. A police investigation report;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Written confirmation, each statement of police suspect interrogation protocol (H) and its existing legislation.