사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. From January 20, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 28,30,00 from the victim on five occasions as stated in the facts charged. However, this is an investment of KRW 50,00,000 in LD business of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) operated by the Defendant. Of these, KRW 30,000,000 should be substituted by the amount lent by the victim to the Defendant, and the remainder of money was invested.
Therefore, there is no fact that the Defendant committed deception, such as written in the facts charged.
B. The Defendant was unable to return the money received from the victim. However, around August 10, 200, the Defendant: (a) around August 10, 2009, the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million from D, to return the money to the victim for 100,000 days in connection with the St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St.s. St. St. St. St. St. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. Co. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S. S. S. S. S. S.....................S.S....S.S.S..s.......s.....s......s..................
Therefore, the defendant has the intention and ability to repay, and there was no intention to commit fraud.