(b) the defendant;

1. Around 16:00 on December 23, 2017, Defendant 2018, Defendant 1160 ordered food and drinking the victim E (33 tax) as if they would normally pay food to the victim E (33 tax) in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul.

However, even if the defendant was provided with food from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price.

The defendant was provided with food equivalent to 19,900 won from the damaged person, and acquired it by fraud.

2. 2018 High Court 824

A. On December 23, 2017, around 19:30 on December 23, 2017, the Defendant ordered food as if the Defendant would normally pay the cost of food to the victim H in G located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the food cost normally.

Defendant 1 provided food equivalent to 23,000 won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

B. On January 12, 2018, around 17:30 on January 12, 2018, the Defendant ordered food as if he would normally pay food to the Victim K in Songpa-gu Seoul.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the food cost.

The defendant was provided with food equivalent to 29,900 won from the injured party and acquired it by fraud.

3. Around January 5, 2018 and around 15:30 on January 5, 2018, Defendant 2018 ordered that food value be paid in N in that it works as the victim M in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L, but the fact did not have the intent and ability to pay food value.

Accordingly, the Defendant was provided with food of 21,900 won from the victim by deceiving the victim.

4. Around January 24, 2018, Defendant 2018, Defendant 845, sent an attitude of normally paying food to the victim Q Q (e.g., age 30) at around 14:30 on January 24, 2018. The Defendant ordered food.

However, even if food is provided by the injured party, there is no intention or ability to pay the price.

Defendant was provided with food equivalent to KRW 13,900 from the injured party.

5. 2018 High Court 923.