On September 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around September 13:25, 2017, at the convenience store operated by Jinju-si, C Victim D (W, 33 S) in this E, which was displayed in the display stand, cut off by inserting the amount of KRW 1,900 in the market value of KRW 1,80,00, the Defendant: (b) 1,600 of the market value of the new Kim Jong-bak Kim-bring at the hold box; and (c) 1,600 of the market value of which is the sum of KRW 1,90,00,000 in the hold box; and (d) 1,300, 1,300, 1,000, 2, 2, 300,000, 3, etc. of the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Summary of evidence under Articles 10(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical drugs;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one hundred thousand won per day converted);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (the suspended sentence: fine of 200,000 won, the defendant suffers from the cognitive disability of the middle-grade Do under the old age of 79, and the victim does not want the punishment) is above the age of 59(1) of the same Act;